join now
newsletters
topics
topics
advertise with us ABA Journal Blawg 100 Award 2009 ABA Journal Blawg 100 Award 2008
Subscribe (RSS Feed)

BigLaw: The June 2011 Law Shucks Lateral Report: Dewey & Leboeuf Welcomes Michael Fitzgerald Home (Sort of) and Much More

By Law Shucks | Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Originally published on July 26, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

For most, June in the large law firm world means the arrival and settling in of summer associates. But for partners, it is often the culmination of a quarter taken exploring opportunities and finalizing plans to move on. Client work tends to slow down slightly, partnership distribution checks have cleared, business plans for the year are finalized (and ready to be slapped into a headhunter's marketing package), so thoughts turn to moving on. Let's see who couldn't resist the spring wanderlust.

Staying in the Family

In our view, some of the most interesting moves are those within the large firm ambit. Two of June's finest intra-moves were Michael Fitzgerald bringing about a dozen corporate and securities lawyers from Milbank to Dewey & LeBoeuf, immediately providing the firm with the Latin America presence it has lacked. Dewey is about twice as big as Milbank, but Milbank had comparable profit-per-partner and probably a broader international footprint, albeit without the depth.

Of course, these moves don't always come down to money. Personal relationships are, in part, responsible for Fitzgerald's move to Dewey. The firm's former chairman, 92-year-old Leonard Joseph, is his father-in-law. Also, Fitzgerald's son, Reid, spent three years as a college intern at Dewey, and will attend Columbia Law School in the fall.

At the end of June in a trend that continued in July, O'Melveny lost three regulatory partners in DC to Allen & Overy, which was quite a surprise because Magic Circle firms have never been known for strong DC presences. The halls of power in our nation's capitol have traditionally been trod only by the whitest of shoes, so the addition of Charles Borden, Chris Salter, and Barbara Stettner shows some groundbreaking expansion.

Feeding Frenzy

When the large firm belly can't get fed by its own denizens, it goes searching farther afield for choice fare. Boutiques are plum targets these days for two types of acquirors — large firms looking to snag talent on the cheap or to shore up an underserved market (geographic location or a practice area), and small- to mid-sized firms trying to find safety in numbers.

Cozen O'Connor gutted IP litigation boutique Cohen Pontani Lieberman & Pavane, taking 19 of the NY firm's 27 lawyers. Five former Cohen Pontani lawyers came aboard as partners: Thomas Langer, Lance Lieberman, Martin Pavane, Thomas Pontani, and Edward Weisz. No word on what happened to the eight men out, although the firm was expected to dissolve, and its Web site now redirects to Cozen O'Connor.

Saul Ewing is also in "go big or go home" mode. It acquired five partners and one associate from Boston's Dionne & Gass. Dana Lanzillo, Don Lussier, Sally Michael, Richard Gass and Joanne Robbins joined as partners. Even for a boutique, that seems unbelievably highly leveraged, so we'll keep an eye out for word of associates not included in the deal. The fate of those left behind is another trend that we'll hit next month for its tragic repercussions.

Greener Pastures

For some, a large firm is no longer the right fit. The classic move out is the Jump In(House). At partner levels it's either a top legal job or out of law entirely to the coveted investment-banking world, as Cleary's former managing partner, Mark Walker did last month, when he joined Lazard in Paris.

The newest trend shows that lawyers may not be as risk-averse as believed. Weil Gotshal IP studs Matthew Powers (despite some recent rough patches) and Steven Cherensky have decided to blaze their own path, leaving the security of the GM Building (yes, we know they didn't sit in NYC) for their own startup practice, Tensegrity Law Group. They'll focus on contingent-fee plaintiff work, although at some point they may go fully over to the dark side, a la John Desmarais, the former Kirkland & Ellis partner who last year founded his very own patent troll by buying a bloc of patents and selling covenants not to sue.

The Revolving Door of Government Work

Another macro trend to keep an eye on this quadrennium is the inflow/outflow of our brothers and sisters in public service. We're about a year out from another election cycle, so quite a few people will be leaving who don't plan to stick around for the next term. Six lawyers left government in June for partnerships at major firms, but we expect that number, and their profiles, to rise in coming months. And, of course, there are some earlybirds. Kathryn Ruemmler will join the administration from Latham & Watkins to serve as White House Counsel.

Another large firm alum who could have a significant impact on that election cycle is Anthony Herman, the Covington partner who was recently named GC of the Federal Election Commission.

Conclusion

As alluded to above, July has some alarming trends, which I'll report on soon here in BigLaw.

Written by Law Shucks, which curates and analyzes data on large law firm lateral hiring.

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Law Office Management | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

BigLaw: A Simple and Secure Way to Integrate iPads (And Other Mobile Devices) Into Your Law Firm

By Matt Berg | Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Originally published on November 23, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

No doubt you've read in BigLaw about all the midsize and large firms equipping their lawyers with iPads — or at least supporting iPads purchased by their lawyers. For example, the BigLaw Pick of the Week earlier this month, Damon Morey Makes iPads Standard Equipment.

Many methods exist for integrating iPads and other mobile devices into your legal environment. For example:

• Should you license, build, and configure mobility servers or gateways (e.g., WorkSite Mobility Server)?

• Should you encourage the installation of numerous purpose-built apps on your mobile devices directly (e.g., LexisNexis' Courtlink, WestLawNext, Linsay Associates' IPLaw)?

• Should you create a VPN connection to encrypt connections from your devices to your LAN?

• Should you implement an expensive and involved enterprise security solution (e.g., MobileIron)?

• Should you require that the IT Department authenticate/approve each device manually before it can be used to connect to your network?

• Should you require that all documents be synced when the device is on your LAN, or even when it is physically plugged into your computers, all of which must then run iTunes?

• Do you need access to applications other than document management, or web-based reference/resource apps? Wouldn't it be nice to be able to access all of your firm's various applications — from Elite to Concordance and everything in between?

Here's One Solution That Works Well

These questions can all seem daunting. There are no wrong answers or approaches necessarily. But some approaches and solutions are easier to implement than others, and some approaches are more or less secure.

Many firms want to use the iPad for a terminal services solution (e.g., Citrix or Microsoft's Remote Desktop Services) as a way to meet this challenge with a degree of simplicity. But what about security? If an employee loses his device, is there a window of opportunity in which a compromised device could be used to breach your network?

At Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, my team and I have developed an easy-to-implement solution that is secure, and provides full access to your application environment for your iPad users. Here's what your firm will need:

1. A Windows 2008 R2 Remote Desktop Services (RDS) Server. Or a server farm if your environment could benefit from the load balancing/failover features of two or more application servers working in concert — and who couldn't really?

2. A Windows 2008 R2 Server configured as a Remote Desktop Services Gateway Server.

3. A two-factor authentication product that uses employee cell phones as physical tokens. Two options — PhoneFactor or SecurEnvoy.

4. An RDP client that supports Secure Gateways. Some possibilities include iTap RDP App for the iPad or Xtralogic Remote Desktop Client for Android, both with the Secure Gateway option, purchased from the App Store or Android Market respectively.

Security First: The Advantages of Two-Factor Authentication

So what is two-factor authentication? Two-factor authentication is based upon what you have (a digital certificate, a mobile phone, or land-line phone) and what you know (a valid login for your firm's network, and a valid password for the same). Two-factor authentication has been in use for many years (perhaps most readily recognizable in the form of an RSA SecurID token key fob), and is superior to other forms of security because it requires that you have both.

For example, if someone were to learn your password they would still be unable to connect to your firm's network without your mobile phone or a valid firm-issued digital certificate. And conversely, it is not enough simply to have the "key" (the digital certificate or cell phone) — one must also have a valid login and password pair to gain access to the network.

Using an employee's mobile phone as a physical token is an elegant way to achieve two-factor authentication. Employees will always have it with them. And use of their mobile phone to effect this authentication is as easy as (1) entering your user name and password (what you know) at the RDS Gateway, (2) answering your phone (what you have) when the service calls you to confirm the login, and (3) pressing "#" to complete the authentication process. For convenience, firm-owned laptops can be equipped with digital certificates (again, what you have) that permit access without requiring a call-back.

Install and configure the RDP client on your mobile devices
The key here is the Secure Gateway support, which permits you to specify both an externally accessible gateway (via IP or DNS), and an internal hostname for pass-through to your RDS Server or Server Farm itself once the two-factor authentication has been achieved.

This solution will work not only with iPads, but also on any Android OS tablet (Samsung Galaxy, Motorola Xoom, etc.) — so long as you purchase an RDP client app for the device that supports Secure Gateways (Xtralogic, iTap).

For that matter, any non-Windows-based remote computer (Unix, Linux, Mac) can connect using this infrastructure as well — again, so long as an RDP client that supports Secure Gateways is available (and they are).

And of course you need not worry about an RDP application when your employees use Windows PCs. With employee mobile phones serving as the "what you have" component of a two-factor authentication solution, employees can securely use any Windows computer (e.g., a kiosk computer at a conference) to remotely access your network.

Conclusion

If your firm has struggled with architecting a solution that provides the level of access to firm applications you would like to support, I think you can recognize the simplicity, security, and power of the solution provided above.

Written by Matthew Berg, Director of IT at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C..

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets | Networking/Operating Systems | Privacy/Security

BigLaw: Using System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) to Monitor the Health of Your Computing Environment

By Matt Berg | Monday, December 5, 2011

Originally published on July 19, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

Many large firms use System Center Configuration Manager 2007 (SCCM), often in concert with Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), to push software updates and patches out to their server and desktop computing environment. Many even use it to deploy new operating systems.

While SCCM, if properly configured with all the appropriate levers pulled and buttons pushed, is a powerful tool for managing and manipulating the desktop and server environment, it falls short as a proactive monitoring tool of these same environments.

Enter System Center Operations Manager (SCOM).

How Does SCOM Work?

Once the server, service accounts, and database are configured (much like SCCM), SCOM has a Discovery wizard that can use the Active Directory or IP address subnets/ranges to identify new "target" computers or devices. Devices and appliances are a bit different (see below), but for computers running a Windows OS, the SCOM server can then push out the SCOM agent to these discovered computers automatically.

And then the magic happens. Once the agent is installed, it begins to monitor a myriad of data points accessible on its host — from event logs, to application states, to CPU, memory, and disk usage. And really, that is just the beginning of what SCOM can monitor and report back to you.

Microsoft's Management Packs: From Basic to Best Practice

If the SCOM agent is up and running on a given target computer, and it is able to call home, then a basic heartbeat is established. But if the target computer is a Microsoft Windows-based computer, and the appropriate "Management Pack" (downloadable for free from Microsoft) is installed on the SCOM server, then the alerts can report a whole lot more than just an up or down OS state.

The Windows 7 client agent, for example, monitors everything from boot performance to memory exhaustion analysis to shell performance to hardware and software component failures.

On the server side, when using the SQL Management Pack for example, the monitor will not only tell you that a backup failed, or let you know about a long-running SQL Agent job, but it will also let you know if your databases aren't configured according to Microsoft's Best Practices (e.g., "The auto close flag for database Northwind is not set according to best practice.")

The Exchange Management pack reports delays in SMTP queuing, log file growth, mailbox availability, etc. You get the picture.

What About Non-Microsoft Servers, Appliances, and Network Devices?

If your non-Microsoft servers, appliances, and network devices can be configured with Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), you can create your own device Management packs (if you are familiar with the data being served up by a given device), or download or purchase the non-Microsoft Management Packs pre-configured to give you access to all of the minutiae detail that the SNMP agent on a given device provides.

As with Microsoft SCOM agents, SNMP-managed devices operate via a software agent installed on each device, the sole purpose of which is to report on device-specific health data. And if it's a name-brand, enterprise class product (e.g., Cisco routers, EMC SANs), you can be sure that every major manufacturer provides SNMP ready to go on all of their shipped products.

When freebie Management Packs are not available (e.g., VMWare), you can buy them from companies that know how to "speak" your server/appliance/device's SNMP language. Some examples:

Veeam Software's nworks Management Pack for VMware

Jalasoft's Smart Management Pack for VMware VirtualCenter

Bridge Ways' System Center Ops Manager

Or you can browse for your product in the SCOM Management Pack Marketplace.

Conclusion

Whether you work for a massive, multi-site international law firm, or a midsize law firm with one, two, or three locations, SCOM is an invaluable tool for staying on top of the health of your firm's computing environment. With SCOM, you can manage your environment as proactively as possible. Don't wait for your users to tell you that you have a problem. Get SCOM up and running and you'll know before they do!

Written by Matthew Berg, Director of IT at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C..

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Desktop PCs/Servers | Networking/Operating Systems

BigLaw: Review of Microsoft's Personal Archive in Exchange 2010 as a Replacement for Third-Party Email Archive Software

By Matt Berg | Friday, December 2, 2011

Originally published on October 11, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

Does your email archiving solution leave you wanting more? Tired of dealing with an Outlook plug-in that doesn't play nice? With archived email and attachments that are sometimes available and sometimes not (usually when you need them the most … like in a client meeting)? With the need to perform two separate searches, often via two different interfaces, to search your "live" email and your archived email?

On the administrative side, are you tired of backing up two separate environments, administering your email archive through a separate admin console, possibly one without the most intuitive knobs, dials and levers for making it behave and perform?

Have you considered eliminating your third party archiving solution altogether, and implementing Exchange 2010's native Personal Archive?

The thought may seem daunting when you let yourself dwell on all of the problems you encountered implementing your third-party archiving solution in the first place, and when you extrapolate the problems you likely will have moving your messages to Exchange 2010's native archive. But there are a number of very sound reasons, from compliance, to recovered software licensing fees, to improved administrator and user experience, that merit serious consideration.

What Is Personal Archive and Why Should You Care?

Personal Archive is a new product name from Microsoft that is entirely unrelated to PST files. In fact, Exchange 2010 has tools for importing any old PST files you might have lying around. Also, Exchange 2010 Archiving requires an Exchange Enterprise Server License and Enterprise CALs sufficient for all user mailboxes using the technology.

Microsoft espouses the ability of native archiving to achieve compliance through the following means: "preservation, discovery, control, protection, reporting, and availability."

At first blush, it appears as though Exchange 2010's toolbox of features could go a fair way toward achieving compliance if used properly in the context of a business compliance policy and practice that is at least moderately disciplined. And yes — Microsoft is careful not to make too grandiose a set of claims about Exchange's native compliance-supporting features being a silver bullet/complete solution for all your compliance needs. But really, there's a lot here.

Some highlights of features that support compliance (and which provide general utility):

Multi-Mailbox Search Support: Configurable through the use of roles to be a process which can be managed outside of IT.

Support for Litigation/Legal Hold: Once applied, all items which are deleted are searchable/recoverable for the duration of the hold.

Content Retention: The ability to specify retentions periods and rules for both production and archival message data which can be different or the same across both environments.

Dynamic Email Signature Blocks: Often required for compliance (e.g., "this is not tax advice" and other such disclaimers) using data (including logos) stored in the Active Directory.

Protection/Message Encryption: Transport Layer Security (TLS), Opportunistic TLS, integrated content filtering, SSL, and more.

Auditing: Permits determination of whether users have access to and when they accessed certain email folders and messages. It can also report on any multi-mailbox searches that have been performed, etc.

Built-in High Availability (HA): Functions provide for the reliability that many compliance standards require, saving your firm from the potential for costly fines and a loss of reputation in the event that critical discovery data is not recoverable.

User Benefits

And the top three user benefits are:

1. No Outlook plug-ins to crash.

2. All email messages (live or archived) are searchable via a single interface using Outlook or webmail.

3. Along with Exchange 2010's increase in the number of messages permissible in the critical Exchange folders (Inbox, Sent Items, Deleted Items), native archiving also eliminates the need for users manually to prune and file their aging messages. The personal archive automatically creates duplicate copies of a given user's mail folder structure within the archive, and moves older messages to the corresponding archive folder (moving anything older than two years to the archive by default, but configurable based upon your firm's business rules).

Administrator Benefits

And the top five administrator benefits are:

1. Simplification of email backups and improved tools for managing retention policies.

2. Simplification of email administration through consolidation of all email and archived email under a single, unified architecture.

3. Improved access to critical administrative functions related to ongoing maintenance, operations, and archiving via webmail.

4. The provision of a native, high availability solution that performs continuous replication of mailbox data ("live" and archival) from a production mail server environment to a backup mail server environment and that simplifies and automates failover of mail services and/or data on the fly.

5. The ability to store production mailbox data on high performance data storage devices (e.g., SANs with SSDs), and either or both backup HA and/or Personal Archive data on cheaper/lower performance disk — without losing any of the seamlessness of the HA solution or of the Personal Archive being always available alongside your live message store.

Well, Should You?

Yes. Exchange 2010's native archiving solution is ready to replace your third party email archiving solution. But is your firm willing — and prepared — to do what it takes to wrestle that costly and complicated monkey from its back?

Written by Matthew Berg, Director of IT at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C..

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Document Management | Email/Messaging/Telephony

BigLaw: Upgrading Your Large Law Firm to Office 2010 and Getting Everyone Trained in Three Easy Steps

By Matt Berg | Thursday, December 1, 2011

Originally published on August 9, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

If you were one of the brave few law firms to make the transition to Office 2007 at some point in the last four years, you'll find that the move to Office 2010 is an easy one. In fact, your users will probably welcome the return of the File Menu, and the many small improvements to the Ribbon — especially its customizability. Let's face it — the Quick Access Toolbar (QAT) is nice, but it's just not the same as the visually-accessible Ribbon.

But if your law firm still uses Office 2003 or an earlier version still, you'll need to take the training aspect of the new Office suite very seriously. Is it harder to use? Worse or scarier than previous versions in some way? Well, no. Office 2010 offers a much better interface. And once you acclimate, you'll never want to go back.

But if you don't manage user expectations, your rollout may not go smoothly to say the least. You could have a full-scale staff revolt on your hands and many long nights in the office.

So how can you increase the odds of a successful upgrade? Follow the three steps discussed in this issue of BigLaw, and you'll come out on the other side of the rollout feeling better than you can ever remember after such an intimidating change management challenge.

Step 1: Promote the Benefits Early

Six months before the rollout starts …

Market the rollout. Provide an early warning. Give everyone time to adjust to the idea, and to accept that it's coming. No pre-learning at the early stages (and let's be honest: you won't be organized enough yet at this point to provide it anyway). Just some marketing and some positive bullets to put a good spin on the upgrade from the get-go: "faster", "more efficient," "greater compatibility with clients," etc.

Step 2: Pre-Learning

Start the pre-learning process about 30 to 60 days before users receive their upgraded systems.

Buy professional materials. Don't try to pull it together yourself. Could you? Even if you have sufficient bench depth at your firm to create the media, collateral, manuals and reference guides, why bother when you can buy products like Traveling Coaches' Office 2010 Rollout Kit at a very reasonable price (based upon the number of employees at your firm)?

Traveling Coaches' Rollout Kit includes the following materials:

• Detailed learning plans for staff, attorneys, paralegals.

• Videos that announce the coming of Office 2010 (essentially commercials).

• An interactive flash application that reveals the top productivity gains in Office 2010.

• Pre-learning lessons (for your intranet). Short and on-point interactive "how tos."

• Training materials (sample documents, training guides, quick reference cards, etc.).

• Floor support aids.

You can also supplement these materials as you see fit with some of the free content that Microsoft provides to help you with the transition. For example:

Interactive "Then and Now" Guides. (I used to insert a footer in Excel 2003 by going to View/Header/Footer. Where is that now?)

The "Menu to Ribbon" reference guides.

Office Migration Guides

The key takeaway here is that you didn't spend any time preparing and assembling these materials. Someone else did it for you. And whether you elect to engage outside trainers or use internal trainers, these materials are still hugely helpful to wrapping your brain around what is involved in the effort, how to structure it, and exactly how to execute on the training aspects of the rollout.

Step 3: Training

Start the actual training itself as close to the time of your users receiving their upgraded systems as possible. Ideally, arrange the training to occur while their system is being upgraded/swapped out.

A lot goes into determining exactly how much training you need for Office 2010. Are you also upgrading any non-Microsoft products at the time? How many "power users" do you have? What third-party applications do you use and how do they integrate with Office 2010? Etc.

If you needed a wild but sophisticated guess as to how much training each user will require for Office 2010, I would suggest that you plan on about three hours of training per user for a basic level of introductory training when coming from an Office suite of 2003 or earlier (or from alternative suites such as WordPerfect).

If you've purchased the Rollout Kit mentioned above, by the way, the included learning plans contain a minute-by-minute breakdown of the training topics broken down in a very granular manner. If you're going to train this material with in-house staff, Traveling Coaches ensures that you can customize its training guide to coincide with the topic selections your firm identifies in the learning plan(s). For large firms with permanent staff dedicated to systems training, the Rollout Kit is really all you'll need to feel confident about the challenge in front of you. And more important perhaps than even your team's confidence, the included materials will make a lasting impression on your user base.

Conclusion

Why build it yourself when somebody has already done the heavy lifting? There are many freely or cheaply available resources out there that can help you achieve success with your Office 2010 rollout. And not only will they save your technology team from excess sweat and tears, but many of these resources are top notch, and will ensure that your Office 2010 rollout is a smashing success.

Written by Matthew Berg, Director of IT at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C..

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Business Productivity/Word Processing | CLE/News/References

BigLaw: Apple Believes in Twitter -- Large Law Firms Should Too

By Adrian Dayton | Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Originally published on July 12, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

The excitement over social media has grown to a fever pitch. LinkedIn recently became a public company, and has absolutely exploded with over 100 million members. Facebook has become ubiquitous as this infographic by Business Insider demonstrates, and will likely become a public company next year.

But when Apple announced which platform it had chosen to integrate into its iOS 5 mobile operating system it bypaseed both Facebook and LinkedIn, going instead with Twitter. So what is it about Twitter? Why would a service that losers use to narrate their mundane lives be deemed so important that the world's most valuable company would permit it to reside at the heart of its crown jewel? Let's take a closer look.

Twitter Is Public

Have you ever attended a cocktail party and noticed that you picked the wrong group with whom to chat? You look over your shoulder and see another group laughing and having much more fun. What would it be like if you could run a simple search to find out who was talking about something interesting, and then join that conversation? That's one of the primary benefits of Twitter — anybody can listen in on conversations of interest. You're not trapped by your "friends."

But aren't most tweets boring, self-centered and mundane? Many of them are, but so are most of the conversations at cocktail parties, the difference being that on Twitter you have more choices. It isn't like Facebook where you have to be friends or pseudo-friends to have a conversation. It isn't like LinkedIn where you need to provide details on past work relationships before you can eavesdrop. Twitter is public, meaning anybody can listen in on any conversation. Better yet, developers can build applications on top of Twitter to better organize that information for law firms and other constituencies.

It's kind of ironic that Apple, which has a closed and formal process for creating iPhone apps and having them approved, has embraced Twitter, which has a decidedly different philosophy. Twitter's openess provides incentive for serendipity and entrepreneurship as it invites people to play with its data. It worked out for the developers of TweetDeck, which created a better way of organizing the Twitter stream. As a result, this gang of 14 employees just sold its business to Twitter for $40 million dollars. Twitter and its community of users are better off because of this openness.

Twitter Is About Sharing Content

Why does all this openness matter to lawyers? There are two ways to add value and gain credibility online. The first is to find and share valuable content. I call these people "collectors." Anybody can be a collector. The second group are those who actually create valuable content in form of articles, podcasts, white papers, videos, etc. The vast majority of social media users are incapable of creating truly helpful content. Lawyers on the other hand have the unique ability to communicate. Thus, Twitter is of great benefit to lawyers willing to create content and let everyone know it exists.

You could argue that Twitter isn't a social network at all. The majority of the tweets shared are links to content on other Web sites. The lame or boring information gets ignored while the truly exceptional information gets passed on — retweeted. Twitter is an information exchange. Those who understand it take information and put it in front of thought leaders and influencers who can further amplify it in ways you can't imagine. Your information!

Can't you just share information by email? Yes but there's less chance of it "going viral" unless you're a bona-fide email publisher like TechnoLawyer. With Twitter, there are no degrees of separation so your information can be passed directly to individuals you may have never met. If your content is very good, Twitter can become a powerful ally in getting your message out.

Why does sharing matter? Many law firms have this part all wrong. They think of sharing on Twitter as a way for them to publish. Just another way to talk about themselves. That's just one facet. The true value of Twitter lies in its ability to help lawyers research and find great information that they can either share via email with their high value contacts or write about on their blog or Web site. Sharing means you can find information online quickly, and then use it to demonstrate your expertise.

Twitter's Learning Curve Requires Commitment

After reading this issue of BigLaw, you may think — "Time to jump on Twitter!" A word of warning. Twitter is not easy to learn. It's easy to sign up. It's easy to send a single tweet, but it is not easy to get going beyond that. As a result, Twitter suffers from a phenomenon in which people join Twitter, send their first tweet, sign off, and never try it again. To get over this hump you need to spend time every day for a couple of weeks to get the hang of it. It is a powerful tool, it's worth spending a few hours to get there.

The marriage between Apple (with about 200 million iOS devices sold) and Twitter (with about 20 million active accounts) makes sense for both sides, but more importantly it assures the longevity of Twitter. If you were waiting for the smoke to clear to decide whether or not Twitter was worth figuring out, the time has come. Get over your issues with tweets, retweets, tweet-ups, and all the other silly words associated with Twitter and give it a chance. Apple has spoken.

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Law Firm Marketing/Publications/Web Sites

BigLaw: Living the Good Life: Why Large Firm Associates Should Stop Complaining

By BL1Y | Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Originally published on August 30, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

Have you ever noticed how much large firm junior associates complain? Well, if you're smart, the answer is "no" because you've already learned to tune that noise out. If you stop and listen though, you might realize that the low rumbling you hear all day isn't actually your HVAC, but an ungrateful recent law grad whining about his terrible life.

Sure, some legitimate complaints exist like in any job. You have to spend your life in a temperature controlled Class A high-rise, and suffer daily under the crippling moral obligations that come with earning multiples of the average household income.

These problems aside, your young lawyers don't know how good they've got it. Below you'll find just a few of the many reasons they should express more gratitude. I encourage you to circulate this issue of BigLaw throughout your firm — especially to said junior associates.

Dude, You Have a Secretary!

The President of the United States has a total of fourteen secretaries, from Hillary Clinton in the State Department to Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security. If you're at a typical large firm, you're probably sharing your secretary with two or three other associates, and one partner. By secretary ratio, the President, the most powerful man in the world, is only 56 times greater than you. By the same metric, you are infinitely greater than anyone without a secretary who has to lick their own envelopes.

That is a lot of greatness to have bestowed on you at the start of your career, so learn to appreciate it. And, unlike the President who has to cover for his secretaries when re-election time rolls around, with just a little bit of greenback grease, your secretary will cover for you. Think Timothy Geithner will spin a yarn for the press corps when Obama takes the morning off to play golf? Not a chance.

Freebies > Cost of Living

Sure, if you're in large firm that means you're also in a big city with some big city rent to pay. You'll also probably have to spend a few of your first paychecks expanding your professional attire.

But you can easily offset these expenses with the lower cost of living that accompanies your lifestyle. No need to shell out $3 or more every morning for coffee or $10 on lunch when you can get free or highly subsidized coffee and food from your cafeteria. Dinner is of course free and delivered as long as you work late. And don't forget about all those free office supplies. You need never step foot in Staples again. Binders, pens, stickies, you name it!

With your late nights and uncertain weekend hours, you're not going to spend a whole lot of money on entertainment and leisure. Those $12 movie tickets can really add up, and a single cancelled vacation can net you four-digit savings (assuming you make refundable plans).

Finally, you can kiss goodbye that money drain called dating. Guys, no more accidentally buying dinner, dessert, and a bottle of wine for someone who has no intention of ever seeing you again. Gals, no need to waste money getting your hair and nails done more than twice a year.

Court Appearances Are Overrated

Here's what great about court appearances as a junior associate — you don't have any. You're not even saddled with the awkwardness of turning them down. Partners will demonstrate their good manners by not even asking you to go.

Your friends may think it's strange that you're a litigator who last saw the inside of a court room during your swearing in ceremony. Don't bother trying to explain why you have it so good. Just smile. After all, did you spend three years and a hundred thousand dollars of tuition on trial advocacy classes? Of course not! You studied case law, the intellectual heavy lifting of legal thought, the meat and potatoes of practice.

Court is a hassle. It's nerve-wracking. You have to leave the office to get there, and you have to wear a suit. A whole entire suit — tie, jacket, everything. You also have to deal with cranky judges and meet opposing counsel face to face. And that's just motion practice. Don't even get me started on the horrors of trials and voir dire.

Staying at the office from 10 am to 10 pm every day is paradise by comparison. Besides, no one ever got held in contempt while in the office library (though shoddy document review can get your firm sanctioned and you fired so take note).

Hanging With Buffet

Above prestige, engaging work, and the daily satisfaction of working elbow-to-elbow with the brightest minds in one of the brightest industries, a large firm job first and foremost means big money.

Some detractors will point to how much of your salary goes to service your student loan debt, but you'll pay it off after 15 or so years — sooner if you live at home or with a roommate in a neighborhood just starting the process of gentrification (look for a neighborhood suffering more from burglary than from violent crime).

Others will note that your salary isn't really that large thanks to federal, state, and in some cases local progressive income taxes. Pay them no mind. They're just jealous. After all, you're on equal footing with Warren Buffet (according to Warren Buffet), and would feel privileged to pay even higher taxes.

Still others will point out that on an hourly basis you earn less than your secretary. However, what they fail to consider is that your secretary doesn't get to keep working past 6 pm or bill hours on the weekend. You see, it isn't just about great pay, but about opportunities to contribute to the firm's profits per partner. Chances are that you'll never partake in any of those profits as a partner yourself, but keep your head high and the dream alive. Shine on you crazy diamond.

Written by BL1Y of Constitutional Daily.

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

BigLaw: Management Lessons and More From Willkie Farr & Gallagher's 22-Year Chairman Jack Nusbaum

By Liz Kurtz | Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Originally published on June 21, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

Lawyers never rise from working in the mailroom to running the law firm — at least not without a three-year leave of absence to attend law school. But Horatio Alger stories exist in our profession. And they're just as inspiring because very few lawyers rise to the pinnacle of the world's largest law firms.

Jack Nusbaum not only achieved this feat, but then bypassed rival law firms one by one on a meteoric climb up the AmLaw 200 during his 22 years at the helm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher.

Like just about everyone reading this newsletter, Nusbaum became an associate after law school. But his career path quickly diverged from the norm as he became a partner just five years later. A gifted lawyer, manager, and rainmaker (the legal profession's equivalent of a triple double), Nusbaum cultivated important clients, worked on matters of great significance, and found himself appointed chairman of Willkie in 1987.

It's never easy to manage but it's certainly easier when times are good. Willkie emerged from the 2008-09 recession relatively unscathed while many of its peers endured a bloodbath the likes of which the legal profession had never experienced. Indeed, some large firms continue to struggle to this day. In January 2010, the New York Law Journal reported that Willkie "had avoided the layoffs and associate deferrals that have stung other firms." The article credits Nusbaum with a diversification strategy he began putting into place after the legal profession's second worst recession in the early 1990s.

Accordingly, we asked Nusbaum if he might share his observations about the large firm world and the most salient management lessons he accumulated over the course of his tenure as chairman. He accepted our invitation. Read and heed BigLaw subscribers.

Get a Head Start and Seize Opportunities

While Nusbaum spent many years at the top of a legal powerhouse, he is strikingly modest about his own accomplishments, including his startlingly fast rise to partnership. But how exactly did he achieve that feat? I had to ask.

By the time Nusbaum graduated from law school (an event, he jokes, that pre-dates the invention of the automobile), he had already worked at Willkie for three years — though not in the mailroom. He was working as a fiduciary accountant at the firm, planning to attend school at night and eventually work at a large accounting firm. When a partner suggested that he instead attend law school during the day, and design his work schedule around classes, Nusbaum agreed.

He attended Columbia Law School while working flexible hours at the firm. The lawyers for whom he worked — as an accountant — took notice, and began asking him to take on matters outside the realm of accounting. Before long, Nusbaum was a de facto junior associate. "I had a head start at practicing," he says modestly, recalling how even as a junior member of the firm, he would receive an assignment along with instructions to "get a younger lawyer" to assist him.

There's No Substitute for Face Time With Clients

In 1987 when a senior partner left the firm, Nusbaum took over as its chairman. "The most difficult time was the beginning," he says, noting that "Willkie Farr was a very nervous firm" when he ascended to its leadership. One departing partner had taken a great deal of business with him, and the firm's biggest client, Shearson Lehman, was in the process of "imploding."

How did Nusbaum approach the task at hand? "The real key to holding the firm together," he realized, "was holding the clients together." Nusbaum attributes his ability to do this in part to luck, but also to his instinct for inspiring confidence. Nusbaum felt that top clients had good reason to stay with the firm, and recalls how he went about personally visiting each of them to convince them that the service for which Willkie was known would not diminish despite personnel changes. His outreach to clients worked.

Leadership Requires Moral Authority

Nusbaum does not have to think long or hard about what makes a managing partner successful. "The most important element," he says, "is moral authority."

Why is moral authority the most essential arrow in the managing partner's quiver? Among other things, he explains, a partner at the top of a horizontal organization like a law firm is first among his peers, and lacks the dictatorial power (or, as Nusbaum more diplomatically phrases it, the "real authority") to force his partners to do much of anything. That's especially true at a firm like Willkie with luminaries such as former New York Governor Mario Cuomo among its ranks. There are no Steve Jobs in the legal world.

"Lawyers tend to be Type A personalities," says Nusbaum, "and Type A personalities tend to approach things with a certain degree of skepticism. To get law firm partners with skeptical, Type A personalities to accept decisions, you need to establish moral authority."

No easy prescription exists for acquiring such gravitas, but Nusbaum equates moral authority and credibility in a manner of speaking. "You have to be good at what your partners do," he explains. "That means not only being a talented, well-respected lawyer," but it also requires that you "understand what they do," so that they feel you have thoroughly considered the decisions that affect them.

That sounds reasonable enough, but it must have been challenging at a large firm like Willkie given its many practice groups, right? Not for Nusbaum whose background lies in transactional work, including mergers and acquisitions.

"The difference between the disciplines is highly overrated," he says. His belief is that if a lawyer is "good in one practice area, he or she can be good at another." The common denominator among the practice areas is having the ability to "figure out issues, and being skilled at persuasion," Nusbaum posits. "Whether you're using those skills to communicate with a judge, with opposing counsel, or with your peers," he adds, "is irrelevant."

What General Counsel Really Want

In response to the often-posed question of whether clients hire firms or lawyers, Nusbaum responds, with a laugh, "Yes."

"As legal practice grows more specialized," he explains, clients are drawn to hire lawyers with established expertise in a particular practice area. This tendency reflects the growing power of general counsel who don't want to be criticized for failing to find the best lawyer for the job.

But, he observes, while "at the end of the day, it starts with a particular lawyer, it doesn't end there." The best lawyer, he explains, is often the one with the best team. "If an excellent lawyer is with a major firm, it gives clients a comfort level" that is invaluable.

The Changing Landscape of Large Law Firms

After more than four decades as a large firm insider, Nusbaum is uniquely qualified to assess the ways in which our world has changed. Among the most pronounced trends he identifies is the evolution of law as a business — fueled in his opinion by American Lawyer's rankings, changing client expectations, and the rising prominence of general counsel.

Nusbaum explains that corporate bosses used to hire a law firm themselves. A company's general counsel simply did not occupy the role they do today. But, in recent years, "more highly qualified lawyers became GCs, and they are much, much more discerning than the average boss." One result of this development is the diminution if not outright disappearance of client loyalty and therefore, the need to practice in a way that reflects the intense competition in the legal marketplace.

While older colleagues may "grumble" about this shift in power, and long for the days of the "relationship partner," Nusbaum looks on the bright side. He points to the efficiencies made possible by better technology. "It gives us an ability to practice law at a speed that simply wasn't possible before," he says, and with a greater degree of thoroughness.

His enthusiasm, however, comes with a caveat. "Technology places a much greater burden on the older generation to train new lawyers, and make sure they understand the concepts they're dealing with," Nusbaum warns. While technology facilitates research, document drafting, and communication with clients, Nusbaum is insistent about the critical role of training.

"We don't want young lawyers who are just mechanics, but don't know how to drive the car," he says. "Technology allows us, on one hand, to practice without the fear that you've missed something, whether it's a typo or a case." On the other hand, he continues, young lawyers need training and judgment to use these tools effectively.

Knowledge Is a Journey

As I wrap up my interview, Nusbaum has some additional words of wisdom.

First, lawyers — junior, senior, young, old — would do well to realize that you'll never know it all. Although some practitioners complain about the need for CLE, Nusbaum views it as a positive requirement, which "forces you to constantly re-learn your trade." Moreover, he adds, "it forces you to teach young lawyers, which is a service to both the person learning and the people being taught."

Second, lawyers should never underestimate the importance of watching others, whether by sitting in the boardroom or the courtroom. He describes the doggedness with which he watched his mentors, and how much he learned by observing their interactions with clients, their personal styles, and the arguments they made — or didn't make.

And, as one who had valuable mentors, Nusbaum believes in the power of inter-generational teaching. "There's an old saying that 'the fish rots from the head,'" he says. "Don't ask me how it gets done, but it gets done — the knowledge gets passed on from generation to generation." Otherwise, firms like Willkie would not survive.

Sometimes, the process of teaching and learning is easy to identify. For example, Nusbaum says, "the best mentors are those who will sit down with a brief or a contract, go through it with care, and explain what's good and bad about it." Of course, he adds, "this is not entirely selfless because you, as the mentor, will be working with this person again."

Other times, the process of passing on knowledge, values, and professional skill may be more abstract. The higher-than-average rates of attorney retention at Willkie may be one such example. Nusbaum describes the firm as one that has always inspired loyalty among its ranks. "I've been here for forty-plus years," he says, "and the attorneys who are running the firm now were summer associates."

What's the secret? He pauses, before answering with characteristic firmness. "Giving people the opportunity to do stimulating, economically rewarding, good work," he says, and then adds, "We intensely foster the desire to make this a home for life." For Nusbaum, at least, there's no place like home.

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Law Office Management

BigLaw: The Promise of Apple's iCloud for Large Law Firms

By Dan Friedlander | Thursday, July 21, 2011

Originally published on June 14, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

Last week Apple hosted its annual World Wide Developers Conference (WWDC) in San Francisco. WWDC enables developers to learn from Apple engineers, but is best known for the opening day "Keynote" at which Steve Jobs and his team usually unveil the next version of iOS, which powers the iPhone and iPad. Last week, Jobs and his team announced not only iOS 5, but also iCloud. iCloud in particular holds great promise for large law firms.

Always Be in Sync Without Syncing

iCloud essentially serves as a central repository for your data. It sends that data to all of your Apple devices — computers, smartphones, and tablets — plus Windows PCs. Both Mac OS X Lion and iOS 5 will take advantage of the estimated 12 petabytes (a petabyte is one million gigabytes) of storage located in Apple's new $1 billion 500,000 square foot North Carolina server farm.

While iCloud makes for fun water cooler conversations for the average technophile like me, what does it mean for you and the "normal" lawyers at your firm? In short, it means always having your work in sync, no matter where you are or what device you're using — all without having to do anything such as sync.

Although Steve Jobs' keynote address focused primarily on using iCloud for music, photography, and word processing applications, iCloud's reach is far more extensive. Jobs alluded to the use of iCloud for storing two significant types of data — documents and key value data.

Regarding documents, the concept is easy to understand. If you create a document on your iPhone, it will be sent up to iCloud and then wirelessly "pushed" to all of your other devices such as your iPad, Mac, and Windows PC. You need not do anything because, as Jobs put it "iCloud is integrated with your apps, everything happens automatically … it just works."

Key value data is best described as user information (e.g., the appointments in your calendar) that doesn't reside in a single contained "document." The storage of key value data is significant in iCloud because it enables developers to transfer information and settings among all of a user's devices without requiring the developer to invest in their own expensive data server.

Until now, this issue has been a major impediment to small-time developers like me as well as law firms that develop their own enterprise apps.

Now, for example, I can incorporate iCloud storage and syncing into my Court Days Pro app, enabling lawyers to sync their litigation calendaring information and settings on all of their devices without me having to purchase and maintain a costly server. Apple not only provides the infrastructure and storage for iCloud at no charge (up to 5 GB per user), but also provides the software programming tools (called APIs) so that developers can easily incorporate the service into their apps.

What About Dropbox and Other Cloud Services?

Other services such as Dropbox (which I covered in BigLaw earlier this year) offer cloud storage and syncing of documents across multiple devices. However, as good as Dropbox is, it is not incorporated into the underlying operating system of the device and, therefore, requires quite a bit of effort by developers to effectively implement the service into their applications. GoodReader is an example of a document reading app that does a good job incorporating Dropbox.

iCloud seems like it may solve many of the problems associated with implementing cloud storage and document syncing in a lawyer's daily workflow. If I take notes at a court hearing, I want those notes on my desktop computer instantaneously so that I can work on them as soon as I return to my office. Likewise, if I revise a letter on my desktop word processor, I want those changes on my iPad. If I scan a document with my iPhone's camera, I want it seamlessly uploaded to my PC. And I want all of this done without me having to click or touch any buttons.

That's the idea behind iCloud. It's now up to developers to put this functionality into the legal and other apps on which your law firms relies.

Written by Dan Friedlander of LawOnMyPhone.com.

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets

BigLaw: What You Need to Keep Your Firm's Computers and Network Secure Plus a Review of Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection

By Matt Berg | Thursday, July 14, 2011

Originally published on May 31, 2011 in our free BigLaw newsletter. Instead of reading BigLaw here after the fact, sign up now to receive future issues in realtime.

I wish it were otherwise, but malware isn't going away. If your midsize or large law firm doesn't have a comprehensive and layered defense in place to prevent infections, you run the risk of your firm's data being exposed, the personal (and too often financial) information of your employees being compromised, your billers losing valuable time from the infection itself or its remediation, and the malware "cleanup crew" in your IT Department developing nervous twitches.

This issue of BigLaw first lays out the basics for those of you in management (you can stop there), and then delves into some of the nitty gritty details for those of you in the IT Department.

The Basics: What You Need to Keep Your Firm Secure

A sound defensive strategy for your firm should include all six of the following protections at an absolute minimum.

1. Hardware firewall protecting your LAN.

2. Web-filtering server/proxy/appliance for all internal Web browsing. For example, Websense or Microsoft Forefront.

3. Anti-spam (and anti-malware) hosted email services (which can also queue your mail in the event you have an ISP or mail server outage). For example, Postini or Barracuda Networks.

4. Anti-malware client on all of your PCs. For example, Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection (FEP), Symantec, Kaspersky, ESET, or Sunbelt.

5. A software firewall on all of your PCs. For example, Windows Firewall or ZoneAlarm.

6. User Access Control (or UAC) on Windows Vista and Windows 7 PCs. Learn it. It's your friend. Don't disable it.

Servers: 64-Bit Can Prevent a Performance Hit

Admittedly, some folks turn off UAC and the Windows Firewall because they "get in the way." I would humbly suggest that you can't afford to permit that. But what can get even stickier is whether you take it any further than these core defenses. The following four options are often skipped because of the CPU and I/O overhead they can introduce in the server and client environment respectively.

1. Anti-malware on Exchange.

2. Anti-malware on SharePoint (because of the high volume of user-originated content).

3. Anti-malware on other Windows Servers in your environment — especially file and Web servers.

4. An endpoint Web filtering/protection product on all of your PCs for safe-browsing off-LAN. For example, ZoneAlarm, or Websense's Data Security products.

I am not here to preach. Okay, well, I guess I am. As such, I strongly recommend reconsidering your decision not to have antivirus solutions in place on your most vulnerable server environments.

Once you make the jump to Exchange 2010, your 64-bit hardware should have more than enough juice to fulfill its own mission as well as carry a slight added burden of providing anti-virus scanning. If you absolutely refuse to install antivirus on your mailbox server(s), you can always install it on your edge transport server(s). Read some of Microsoft's own thoughts on the matter.

Clients: Microsoft's "Free" FEP v. The Competition

No matter the complexity or simplicity of your solutions and policies, the most critical (and vulnerable) component of your layered defense is ultimately where the rubber actually meets the road (or more accurately: the user meets the Internet) — the anti-malware client installed on your user PCs.

Why is the word "free" in quotes above? Well, if you want antivirus on your home PC, or if you have a home-based business, then Microsoft Security Essentials (same product as FEP minus the ability to centrally administer it via System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) is a truly free anti-malware product. If you fall into either of those two "home" classifications, go for it.

But importantly for this newsletter's audience, FEP is included under the Core CAL license (I assume that, as a medium to large firm, you have a volume licensing agreement including at least the Microsoft Core CAL license). If you are an Enterprise License customer, you are licensed for nearly the entire Forefront Architecture (Exchange, SharePoint, Lync Server, Unified Access Gateway, Exchange Online, etc.) minus only the Threat Management Gateway, which you must license separately.

But does FEP work as well as Symantec, Kaspersky, ESET, or any of the other products out there? From our firm's anecdotal experience, yes!

We have not discerned any observable drop in our protection since shifting to FEP from Sunbelt's Vipre. And even if we (hypothetically — which is not a foregone conclusion) lost a tick in performance, we would have made up for it in the improved manageability of having the updates all feed through our Windows Server Updates Services (WSUS) server and all administration and reporting effected through SCCM. (If you are already using SCCM then you could have FEP deployed today, by the way. The SCCM deployment packages for FEP are included on the install media you can download from the Microsoft Volume Licensing Service Center.)

Anecdotally, we have encountered situations in which FEP found something that Vipre didn't, just as there were situations in which Vipre found something that Symantec didn't (back when we switched to Vipre) — and vice versa. But if you'd like more than anecdotal support for justifying the switch, I think you'll find that, performance-wise, while there are a handful of products out there with a better track record, FEP is better than most, and within easy striking distance of even the best.

All large firms today have volume license agreements in place with Microsoft. To do otherwise would be financially irresponsible when you consider the per-seat cost savings alone — never mind the additional training and support benefits that come with a volume licensing agreement.

So why not take advantage of what your firm already owns? Historically, the answer you might have given is "Because I can get a better product from …" (Symantec, Kaspersky, etc.). But Microsoft's new anti-malware product is, if not at the very top of the standings, at least a solid and legitimate player in the field. And the advantages of its tight integration with SCCM, WSUS, and your Windows-based PC's native Windows Update infrastructure, give it a true edge over the competition.

Written by Matthew Berg, Director of IT at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C..

How to Receive BigLaw
Many large firms have good reputations for their work and bad reputations as places to work. Why? Answering this question requires digging up some dirt, but we do with the best of intentions. Published first via email newsletter and later here on our blog, BigLaw analyzes the business practices, marketing strategies, and technologies used by the country's biggest law firms in an effort to unearth best and worst practices. The BigLaw newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. Please subscribe now.

Topics: BigLaw | Desktop PCs/Servers | Networking/Operating Systems | Privacy/Security | Utilities
 
home my technolawyer search archives place classified blog login